Evaluasi Program Bantuan Premi Asuransi Nelayan (BPAN) Di Dinas Kelautan Dan Perikanan Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah (Studi Kasus: Kelurahan Sarudik)
Keywords:
BPAN, Fishermen Insurance, CIPP ModelAbstract
The Fishermen Insurance Premium Assistance Program (BPAN) is a government policy aimed at providing social protection for fishermen who face high risks in fishing activities. However, the effectiveness of program implementation at the local level still encounters several challenges, including limited access to information, administrative barriers, and low sustainability of participation. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the BPAN Program in Central Tapanuli Regency using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model developed by Stufflebeam. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach. The research was conducted at the Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of Central Tapanuli Regency and Sarudik Village. The informants were selected through purposive sampling, consisting of 11 participants from local government officials, fishermen group representatives, and beneficiary fishermen. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, involving data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that BPAN has high relevance to the protection needs of fishermen. In the context dimension, the program is aligned with community needs; however, socialization activities have not fully reached all target groups. In the input dimension, program resources and implementation mechanisms are available, but challenges remain regarding beneficiary quotas and fishermen’s administrative readiness. In the process dimension, implementation has followed established procedures, although bureaucratic barriers and service delays persist. In the product dimension, the program provides benefits in the form of increased security and financial protection, but continued participation after the subsidy period remains low. The BPAN Program in Central Tapanuli Regency has been implemented and provides tangible benefits; however, it has not yet achieved optimal effectiveness. Strengthening public communication, simplifying administrative procedures, improving inter-institutional coordination, and developing sustainable financing strategies are required to ensure the continuity of social protection for fishermen.
Abstrak
Program Bantuan Premi Asuransi Nelayan (BPAN) merupakan kebijakan pemerintah untuk memberikan perlindungan sosial kepada nelayan yang memiliki tingkat risiko tinggi dalam aktivitas penangkapan ikan. Namun, efektivitas implementasi program di tingkat daerah masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan, seperti keterbatasan akses informasi, kendala administrasi, dan keberlanjutan kepesertaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi Program BPAN di Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah menggunakan model evaluasi Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Stufflebeam. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah dan Kelurahan Sarudik. Informan dipilih melalui purposive sampling yang terdiri atas 11 orang, yaitu unsur pemerintah daerah, pengurus kelompok nelayan, dan nelayan penerima manfaat. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi nonpartisipan, dan dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan model interaktif Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña melalui tahapan kondensasi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BPAN memiliki relevansi tinggi terhadap kebutuhan perlindungan nelayan. Pada aspek context, program telah sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat, tetapi sosialisasi belum menjangkau seluruh kelompok sasaran. Pada aspek input, sumber daya dan mekanisme program telah tersedia, namun masih terdapat kendala kuota penerima dan kesiapan administrasi nelayan. Pada aspek process, pelaksanaan telah mengikuti prosedur, tetapi masih ditemukan hambatan birokrasi dan keterlambatan pelayanan. Pada aspek product, program memberikan manfaat berupa rasa aman dan perlindungan finansial, tetapi keberlanjutan kepesertaan setelah subsidi berakhir masih rendah. Program BPAN di Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah telah berjalan dan memberikan manfaat nyata, tetapi belum optimal. Penguatan sosialisasi, penyederhanaan administrasi, peningkatan koordinasi antarinstansi, serta strategi keberlanjutan pembiayaan diperlukan agar perlindungan sosial bagi nelayan dapat berlangsung secara berkelanjutan.
References
Amma, Gisela Mburu, Nanang Bagus, and Agung Suprojo. “Implementasi Kebijakan Bantuan Langsung Tunai Di Desa Sidomulyo Kota Batu Berdasarkan Analisis Van Meter Dan Van Horn.” Lenvari: Journal of Social Science 2, no. 1 (2024): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.61105/jss.v2i1.96.
Aprilia, Ryanty, Debora Selly Hutabarat, and Putri Cristin. “Transformasi Mata Pencaharian Generasi Muda Dalam Komunitas Nelayan Di Bintan.” JIMU:Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipliner 4, no. 02 SE-Artikel (June 2, 2026). https://doi.org/10.70294/jimu.v4i02.2268.
Aziz, Ahmad Abdul. “Strategi Peningkatan Kesadaran Dan Akses Jaminan Sosial Dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Nelayan Di Kabupaten Indramayu” 1 (2025): 19–28. https://doi.org/10.31002/rosee.v1i2.2872.
Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design-4-246896, 2020.
Daniarsyah, Dida. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Program Kartu.” Journal of Indonesia Public Administration and Governance Studies (Jipags) 3, no. NO DATE (2019): 628–43. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jipags.v3i2.7552.
Dewi, Irlina, Titin Sumarni, and Indra Indra. “PERAN BADAN PERMUSYAWARATAN DESA (BPD) TERHADAP PEMERINTAHAN DESA Studi Kasus Desa Pambang Pesisir Kecamatan Bantan.” Jurnal Yustisiabel 4, no. 2 (2020): 118–27. https://doi.org/10.32529/yustisiabel.v4i2.508.
Findra Riadi, Yacob Noho Nani, Raihan Hanasi. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Program Kartu Pelaku Usaha” 5, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54923/researchreview.v5i1.389.
Joko Pramono. S. Sos., M S. Implementasi Dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Unisri Press, 2020. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=yrubEAAAQBAJ.
Lymer, David, Jesper Clausen Simon Funge-Smith, and Weimin Miao. Status and Potential of Fisheries and Aquaculture in Asia and the Pacific 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 2008. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0433e/i0433e00.pdf.
Miles, M B, A M Huberman, and J Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications, 2014. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=3CNrUbTu6CsC.
Murty, Theta. “Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Asuransi Nelayan.” Simbur Cahaya, no. 18 (2020): 158–75. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v27i2.1043.
Nur Aisyah, Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, and Ahmad Muhaisin B Syarbaini Tanjung. “Analisis Partisipasi Program Asuransi Nelayan Mandiri Terpercaya Di Kota Sibolga.” Jurnal Lentera Bisnis 13, no. 3 (2024): 1686–98. https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v13i3.1213.
Patton, M Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications, 2014. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ovAkBQAAQBAJ.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. “The CIPP Model for Program Evaluation BT - Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation.” edited by George F Madaus, Michael S Scriven, and Daniel L Stufflebeam, 117–41. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_7.
Weyant, Emily. “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th Edition.” Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 19, no. 1–2 (2022): 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231.





